vol. 02 · tier 03 // ch. 06 of 10 · advanced course
Portfolio Construction
A trader thinks in trades. A portfolio manager thinks in allocations across strategies and assets. This chapter is about getting from "I have 5 ideas" to "I have a coherent, ris…
- read
- ~4 min
- length
- 1,090 words
- position
- 06 of 10
6. Portfolio Construction
A trader thinks in trades. A portfolio manager thinks in allocations across strategies and assets. This chapter is about getting from “I have 5 ideas” to “I have a coherent, risk-balanced book.”
Why portfolio construction matters
Two strategies, each with 15% CAGR / 20% drawdown, run together with low correlation can yield ~15% CAGR / 12% drawdown. That’s a better Sharpe without sacrificing return. Free lunch via diversification.
The covariance / correlation matrix
For N strategies (or stocks), you need:
- Mean returns .
- Volatilities .
- Pairwise correlations .
Portfolio variance:
Diversification works only when . The lower (or more negative), the better.
Mean-variance optimization (Markowitz)
The classical method: for a given target return, find weights that minimize variance.
Output: an efficient frontier of optimal portfolios.
Why pure Markowitz often fails in practice
- Estimates of are notoriously noisy → optimizer puts huge weights on the highest-mean asset.
- Correlation matrices are unstable, especially in crises.
- Result: very concentrated, high-turnover portfolios that underperform live.
Fix: Use shrinkage estimators (Ledoit-Wolf), Black-Litterman with priors, or simpler heuristics below.
Risk parity
Rather than equal capital weights, equal risk contributions.
A high-vol asset gets a smaller weight; a low-vol asset gets a larger one. Each contributes the same to portfolio risk.
Example
- Strategy A:
- Strategy B:
Equal capital (50/50) → A dominates the risk. Risk parity → B gets 75% capital, A gets 25%, both contribute equal vol.
This is what Bridgewater’s “All Weather” portfolio is built on.
The Kelly criterion (multi-asset version)
For multiple correlated bets, the optimal fraction matrix is:
(where is covariance, is excess returns vector).
Same caveat as single-asset Kelly: full Kelly is too aggressive. Use fractional Kelly (¼ to ½).
Volatility targeting
Pick a portfolio vol target (e.g., 15% annualized). Scale leverage up/down to maintain it.
target_vol = 0.15
realized_vol = compute_30d_vol(portfolio)
leverage = target_vol / realized_vol
Pros:
- Smoother equity curve.
- Reduces blow-up risk (auto-deleverages in crises).
Cons:
- Procyclical when vol spikes mid-trade (forces selling at bad prices).
- Adds turnover.
Most professional CTA / hedge funds run vol-targeted books.
Position sizing for a multi-strategy book
For each strategy, decide:
- Capital allocation — % of total capital.
- Risk allocation — % of total daily VaR / vol budget.
- Max drawdown trigger — auto-deleverage if breached.
A simple framework:
| Strategy | Capital % | Vol target | Stop-loss (DD trigger) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Momentum (long equity) | 40% | 18% | −20% |
| Mean reversion / pairs | 25% | 8% | −10% |
| Short premium options | 20% | 12% | −12% |
| Long vol / tail hedge | 5% | 30% | (no stop, hedge) |
| Cash | 10% | 0% | — |
Total portfolio vol target ≈ ~15%, with explicit drawdown circuit breakers per sleeve.
Correlation in crisis
“When you need diversification most, you have it least.”
In normal times, strategies might be uncorrelated. In a crisis (March 2020, August 2024 carry-trade unwind), everything correlates. Long equity, short vol, mean-reversion — all hit at once.
Defense:
- Maintain a small always-on long-vol sleeve (cheap OTM puts on Nifty).
- Hold meaningful cash (5–20%).
- Have non-equity diversifiers (gold, bonds, USD-denominated).
These positions lose money 95% of the time. The 5% they pay off, they save the entire portfolio.
Factor exposure
Even an “actively managed” portfolio is often a closet-bet on standard factors:
| Factor | Description | Long-term premium |
|---|---|---|
| Market (β) | Long equity index | Yes |
| Size | Small-cap minus large-cap | Modest |
| Value | Cheap minus expensive (low P/B) | Yes (long history) |
| Momentum | Past winners minus losers | Yes (strongest) |
| Quality | High ROE/low debt minus opposite | Yes |
| Low volatility | Low-vol stocks beat high-vol risk-adjusted | Yes |
Run a regression of your portfolio returns on these factors. Most “alpha” turns out to be hidden factor exposure. Genuine alpha (residual after factors) is rare.
If your strategy is just “long momentum + long quality,” you don’t need fancy backtests — buy the relevant factor ETFs and save costs.
Rebalancing
Even great portfolios drift. Rebalance:
- Time-based: quarterly or monthly.
- Threshold-based: when a position drifts > 5% from target.
- Vol-targeted: continuous rebalancing to maintain vol budget.
Trade-off: more frequent → tighter to plan but higher costs.
A practical multi-strategy portfolio (₹50L example)
Capital ₹50L, target portfolio vol 12%:
| Sleeve | Strategy | Capital | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long equity | Momentum top-15 NSE | ₹15L | Quarterly rebalance |
| Long equity | Pullback swing trading | ₹10L | Active |
| Stat arb | Pairs trading (banks) | ₹8L | Always-on |
| Options | Short Nifty/Bank Nifty weekly condors | ₹6L (margin) | Weekly cycle |
| Tail hedge | Long monthly OTM Nifty puts | ₹0.5L | Always rolling |
| Cash | Liquid funds | ₹10.5L | Dry powder + buffer |
Expected combined: ~14–18% CAGR with ~12–15% max DD if regimes are normal. A regime change can hurt — but no single sleeve can blow up the whole book.
Drawdown management
Pre-define what happens at each drawdown level:
| Portfolio DD | Action |
|---|---|
| 5% | Normal — no action |
| 10% | Reduce active exposure by 25% |
| 15% | Reduce by 50%, switch off worst-performing strategies |
| 20% | Move to 70% cash, only run highest-conviction sleeve |
| 25% | Stop trading entirely. Full review. Don’t restart for 30 days. |
This is a discipline mechanism. Without pre-commitment, you’ll over-trade out of drawdowns and dig deeper.
Tracking & attribution
Every month, decompose returns:
- Total portfolio return.
- Per-sleeve contribution.
- Per-strategy P&L.
- Per-factor exposure.
This tells you what actually made/lost money — not what you think did. Often surprising.
Reading list
- Active Portfolio Management — Grinold & Kahn (the institutional bible).
- The Intelligent Asset Allocator — William Bernstein.
- Asset Management — Andrew Ang (factor investing).
- Expected Returns — Antti Ilmanen (very deep).